<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: TTM plots NCC->SARA for oct'99, may & aug 2000


> Have you looked at the software you are using for the BGP peerings. 
> And the machine you are using to run that sw on.

Yes. I haven't identified exact problem. From remote
end (AT&T) was seeing peer reset and told me they see upto
8% packet loss. 

> 0-4% packet can hardly account for a session loss based on TCP.

EBGP sends the keep alives over tcp and it is more sensitive
than a TCP applications.

> >So this probably need to be sorted out before we upgrade
> >AMS-IX lan interface ?
> 
> Why before? I think the AMS-IX upgrade shouldn't be interfered by 
> this. Even it happens to be a problem with the fast ethernet card in 
> marken, it can only provides us more data and if we have to move the 

Only suggesting packet loss to service net should be looked ASAP
we don't have to wait for exchange LAN interface upgrade to solve this.
On the other side if we upgrade this problem could disappear or 
we will get more confused and blame it to two interfaces. 

> connection to a 10Mbit/s ethernet while the card is replaced, then we 
> are no worse than now. 

more packets to process/switch.

-antony







<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>